From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 9 18:30:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15DAA1065676 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2011 18:30:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6FBE8FC1C for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2011 18:30:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RCy97-00041B-5A for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2011 11:30:45 -0700 Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 11:30:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1318185045153-4885908.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <4E91E1A5.2020809@gmail.com> References: <1318172010503-4885362.post@n5.nabble.com> <4E91E1A5.2020809@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: KDE3 de facto EOL, Project Trinity? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 18:30:46 -0000 I know, but neither is direct KDE3 replacement, nor does offer "complete user experience" (whatever it means, but I'm thinking of UI consistence mainly). Speaking of lightness, XFCE is memory hungry these days and Linux centric, and Fluxbox is not that light after all. I personally use dwm or mcwm, but it bears none relevance whatsoever. KDE3 was nice in that "DE which is not yet completely blown-out-of-proportions" way :) Thanks for attention. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/KDE3-de-facto-EOL-Project-Trinity-tp4885362p4885908.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com.