From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 14 18:59:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615F616A41C for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 18:59:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345D443D1F for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 18:59:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5EIxNqL012876; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:59:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.NUXI.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id j5EIxNr7012875; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:59:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:59:23 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Emanuel Strobl Message-ID: <20050614185923.GA12375@dragon.NUXI.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Emanuel Strobl , Lyndon Nerenberg References: <200504262010.49509@harrymail> <20050429200029.GC232@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <200506141824.17451@harrymail> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200506141824.17451@harrymail> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Lyndon Nerenberg Subject: Re: groff alternative? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 18:59:28 -0000 On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 06:24:07PM +0200, Emanuel Strobl wrote: > today I read a news article (http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/60600) > about OpenSolaris beeing released, but is there also the groff alternative > included? > I'd love to see a lean replacment for our current gnu version. Before everyone gets all happy thinking we can incorporate all kinds of bits from Open Solaris - one should read the license agrement first. COMMON DEVELOPMENT AND DISTRIBUTION LICENSE Version 1.0 .. 3.1. Availability of Source Code. Any Covered Software that You distribute or otherwise make available in Executable form must also be made available in Source Code form and that Source Code form must be distributed only under the terms of this License. this puts the CDDL1.0 in the same boat as GPL'ed code from a BSD stand point. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)