From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Nov 12 12:51:09 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92AFE713D7 for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 12:51:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baho-utot@columbus.rr.com) Received: from cdptpa-cmomta01.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9509A66FB8 for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 12:51:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baho-utot@columbus.rr.com) Received: from raspberrypi.bildanet.com ([65.186.81.207]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id Drj1eex9qHlP7Drj4ef682; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 12:51:02 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.143] (helo=desktop.example.com) by raspberrypi.bildanet.com with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1eDrj1-0005V0-5p for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 12:50:59 +0000 Subject: Re: Firefox (Doesn't) Build To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: From: Baho Utot Message-ID: <60c7d7d0-124f-7bc1-f835-53579d2747bd@columbus.rr.com> Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 07:50:59 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfGzPahC2O9xJLKjeBqYNUGpy9HZQ9sTJHojo+0H/mtboARmGIlU07jgTgKoTb5yQm+AzXYeADuFWwjphQtYJ0EDUgZjNkr7GpyZTQOUIEfmKTGbCfYWu WROg91W2DBsmsEeEpB3txwCXUa041BfF3+CnbLyVDtSPgD7DpZC7ga7D8xd86ibeL5UcqgJQXVrHjXXkLcuj6+CQeFsvlT/R+OA= X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 12:51:09 -0000 On 11/12/17 06:03, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > On 12/11/2017 07:14, Jonathan Chen wrote: >> On 12 November 2017 at 12:16, Patrick Dorion >> wrote: >>> What's the difference between using Poudriere or Synth, though? >>> >>> This is a clean system, I can't imagine a jail being cleaner... it >>> was unpacked from the DVD the day before yesterday.... >> Both are clean room builds; ie where only minimal build dependancies >> are installed for each port build. The main difference is that: >>   * poudriere uses jails to achieve this >>   * synth uses unionfs+chroot to achieve this > > Does it mean synth can't be used on ZFS? AFAIK unionfs isn't properly > supported on ZFS, i.e. a file that exists in the underlying fs can't be > marked as deleted in the overlying fs. > > GrzegorzJ I use synth on a ZFS raid system....works fine