Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 07:50:59 -0500 From: Baho Utot <baho-utot@columbus.rr.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox (Doesn't) Build Message-ID: <60c7d7d0-124f-7bc1-f835-53579d2747bd@columbus.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <a3c414cc-2cf6-2dec-c467-c2ed0aa5c1e6@gjunka.com> References: <BL2PR05MB2274B42AD1B2CFE4B5215767BB550@BL2PR05MB2274.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <BL2PR05MB22748A248A96B4ECBE5E40EBBB550@BL2PR05MB2274.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAJuc1zM1JqzYYUOHTP=VpAqi6Rz%2BEvGAW6OyODsg9W_mjH6xMg@mail.gmail.com> <a3c414cc-2cf6-2dec-c467-c2ed0aa5c1e6@gjunka.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/12/17 06:03, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > On 12/11/2017 07:14, Jonathan Chen wrote: >> On 12 November 2017 at 12:16, Patrick Dorion >> <dorionpatrick@outlook.com> wrote: >>> What's the difference between using Poudriere or Synth, though? >>> >>> This is a clean system, I can't imagine a jail being cleaner... it >>> was unpacked from the DVD the day before yesterday.... >> Both are clean room builds; ie where only minimal build dependancies >> are installed for each port build. The main difference is that: >> * poudriere uses jails to achieve this >> * synth uses unionfs+chroot to achieve this > > Does it mean synth can't be used on ZFS? AFAIK unionfs isn't properly > supported on ZFS, i.e. a file that exists in the underlying fs can't be > marked as deleted in the overlying fs. > > GrzegorzJ I use synth on a ZFS raid system....works fine
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?60c7d7d0-124f-7bc1-f835-53579d2747bd>