From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 24 05:06:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B9D106564A for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 05:06:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723788FC15 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 05:06:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so4752480pyb.10 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 22:06:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=FeDC4/BcDy7QLAwAXg834AsAYxWZpLUwKaRbNroNkvA=; b=CAD95qszLMB/eR62kMBUTLTNJ0IJZBFgodSUod3CU+fUjuTqe+k20NjDIaNrcO8xaAf+Hnogh0StrdybEG7+FUNWhSxnOY8RsRVNKcgU1+Ldg+TyhHE9TmnDhS0Hzhxe99vx79YbXdyVI1fEq7bKcpiaqiNj5rAQNDOoF8CDYfo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=qYK1lqeDBe0YiOx9A+AEIH5vf3pGJOpHaSTWgY/UCESWacZ7vGHj4XSva5Ezsh/wtvQvsGK9rzq373xaPACKwLh/L+C68tcrtnBemSNNM3JHhrQN0ZIuMm8wUnj3rjI442nvFMEKkfZF6Yg3a1SO9KZVrDMqaIm1kFaIzUnPRzY= Received: by 10.140.185.19 with SMTP id i19mr1003310rvf.296.1209011992122; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:39:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.143.14 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:39:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:39:52 +0800 From: "Adrian Chadd" Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com To: "Antony Mawer" In-Reply-To: <480FB389.2030102@mawer.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <8481.1208889581@critter.freebsd.dk> <480E3E66.3000303@samsco.org> <480E589C.8010108@delphij.net> <480EE8B2.2020907@higis.ru> <20080423154626.F64388@fledge.watson.org> <480FB389.2030102@mawer.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 775944539bd8e77c Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Robert Watson , Dmitriy Kirhlarov Subject: Re: Http Accept filters (accf_http) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 05:06:09 -0000 On 24/04/2008, Antony Mawer wrote: > > Does this mean that on a multi-core system, one is better avoiding accept > filters and accepting a small latency hit in return for better SMP > scalability/reduced lock contention? Try benchmarking it? Somehow I don't think the HTTP accept filter does what people think it does. adrian -- Adrian Chadd - adrian@freebsd.org