Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 2 Feb 1997 12:51:35 -0700 (MST)
From:      Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
To:        narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee (Narvi)
Cc:        terry@lambert.org, gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu, hackers@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: performance puzzler
Message-ID:  <199702021951.MAA08288@phaeton.artisoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970202201858.13473A-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee> from "Narvi" at Feb 2, 97 08:20:55 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > The PCI and EISA standards specify 33MHz as their top end.
> 
> Where did I read about 66Mhz revision/mode for PCI? Was it in a dream or
> just a "not supported by anybody yet" possibility as is the 64bit card
> width. Or was it all just a dream or erroneus news article?

The PCI SIG has been discussing this.  Obviously, the 64bit version
can't use the same edge connector because there aren't 32 free lines;
all this "64bit PCI card" hype claimed by video vendors is on-card
data path, not bus data path.

The 66MHz has also been discussed, but requires a way to key the bus
as to which type of card is present so it can introduce a wait state
per cycle for older cards.

One problem with the design is that the bus chaining used in current
Intel chip designs won't work: you can't send 66MHz signals down a bus
if you have 33MHz cards potentially listening or attempting to master
the bus.  This basically means that the Intel PCI bus chips can't
tie all the slots to the same chip lines, if you are going to try
to use the same card connector.  This is a win, in that it means that
we will finally get over the 4 slot limit imposed by the line drivers
(which doesn't exist in the Motorola and Apple PCI chipsets because
they were not lazy in their design).  It's bad, because it means
new motherboard designs, and PCI has just settled down from the last
minor revision to the spec..  8-(.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199702021951.MAA08288>