Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:04:31 -0600 From: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> To: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Patching problem Message-ID: <790a9fff0601231504q75b87e14j261faf30686adcac@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <D7B25AB7C48991A6558EB00E@utd59514.utdallas.edu> References: <D7B25AB7C48991A6558EB00E@utd59514.utdallas.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/23/06, Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> wrote: > I'm working on a slave port that applies some patches that are not needed > in the master port. > > Three of the files being patched are op_sguil.c, op_sguil.h and > op_plugbase.c. Those files exists in WRKDIR/src/output-plugins when the > tarball is extracted. How should I name these patches so that they will = be > applied? > > I tried patch-src-output-plugins-op_*, but that fails. (I'm sure it's > because of the conflict in naming the output-plugins dir with a dash.) > Is it failing when the port tries to apply the patch? If your patch file looks like: --- op_sguil.c-orig=0911 Nov 2005 10:29:21 -0000=091.2 +++ op_sguil.c=0913 Nov 2005 12:00:59 -0000 : Then you need to edit so that it contains the patch to the file: --- src/output-plugins/op_sguil.c-orig=0911 Nov 2005 10:29:21 -0000=091.2 +++ src/output-plugins/op_sguil.c=0913 Nov 2005 12:00:59 -0000 : Scot -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?790a9fff0601231504q75b87e14j261faf30686adcac>