From owner-freebsd-current Thu Apr 19 10:25: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from ipcard.iptcom.net (ipcard.iptcom.net [212.9.224.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB0637B423 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 10:25:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from vic.sabbo.net (dialup15-34.iptelecom.net.ua [212.9.229.162]) by ipcard.iptcom.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA47685; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 20:24:57 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (big_brother.vega.com [192.168.1.1]) by vic.sabbo.net (8.11.3/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f3JHOQT52196; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 20:24:26 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <3ADF1F36.44A3AA54@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 20:24:06 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Vega International Capital X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: uk,ru,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Dillon Cc: Doug Barton , "Alfred Perlstein \"'current@freebsd.org'\"" Subject: Re: FW: Filesystem gets a huge performance boost References: <200104161634.f3GGYZs11356@aslan.scsiguy.com> <200104162146.f3GLkGT82369@earth.backplane.com> <3ADBF9FA.9D1C4DB4@DougBarton.net> <20010417011335.V976@fw.wintelcom.net> <3ADC0221.32127C39@DougBarton.net> <3ADEDE2F.573C20A1@FreeBSD.org> <200104191632.f3JGWVG54689@earth.backplane.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Matt Dillon wrote: > : > :What do you think about attached patch? > : > :-Maxim > > mmm.. I think it would just confuse the issue and prevent us from > being able to change the kernel default trivially. 99.5% of the > FreeBSD boxes out there are just going to want it to be on by default. Point taken and issues fixed, thank you! > We could provide a commented-out rc.conf variable and support in rc > to allow the sysadmin to set it, but we should not provide a default > in the rc system or try to create yet another configuration file. The > issue doesn't require that level of sophistication. But we already have sysctl.conf and appropriate rc.sysctl, haven't we? What's wrong with putting some useful payload into it? -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message