From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar 10 10:55:49 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A892D16A4CE; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:55:49 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.ciam.ru (mail.ciam.ru [213.147.57.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3DDB643D1D; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:55:49 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from msd-mtu.mbrd.ru ([195.34.35.77] helo=[172.16.4.9])
	by mail.ciam.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x)
	id 1D9LKU-000MGK-Ae; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:55:46 +0300
Message-ID: <423027B1.8080503@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:55:45 +0300
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217
X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc>
References: <87is46kzk1.fsf@neva.vlink.ru>
	<41C26F23F7DF023CB3DF35C5@cc-171.int.t-online.fr>
	<20050305151903.GC26240@hub.freebsd.org>	<87mzth18e2.fsf@neva.vlink.ru>
	<1DE178D508C1D70D1B5F9E87@cc-171.int.t-online.fr>
	<874qfpupk5.fsf@neva.vlink.ru>
	<DDE9BD25F957493B50EE49C5@cc-171.int.t-online.fr>
In-Reply-To: <DDE9BD25F957493B50EE49C5@cc-171.int.t-online.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
cc: Denis Shaposhnikov <dsh@neva.vlink.ru>
cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG>
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: unionfs 5.4
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:55:49 -0000

Mathieu Arnold wrote:

> +-le 06/03/2005 11:49 +0300, Denis Shaposhnikov écrivait :
> |>>>>> "Mathieu" == Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc> writes:
> | 
> |  Mathieu> Well, nullfs and unionfs have the same BUGS section :-)
> |  Mathieu> OTOH, nullfs has never panic'ed me, whereas unionfs has.
> | Possible, but I can't use it for jail's system because it very slow.
> 
> I find that pretty strange, I'll be thinking that it should be at least as
> fast, if not faster, I'll make some tests this week.
> 

I'd like to add 'me too' note.
I've found nullfs toooo slow in jail.

-- 
Sem.