From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec 19 00:53:47 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E4716A4CE
	for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:53:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de (mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de
	[193.174.154.14])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78DA843D48
	for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:53:45 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de)
Received: from beagle (beagle [193.175.132.100])hBJ8rgp03845;
	Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:53:42 +0100 (MET)
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:53:42 +0100 (CET)
From: Harti Brandt <brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
To: Walter Hop <freebsd@walter.transip.nl>
In-Reply-To: <92527552015.20031219053526@blue.calx.nl>
Message-ID: <20031219094952.B33736@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de>
References: <92527552015.20031219053526@blue.calx.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Sun Netra T1 AC200 - practical questions
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 08:53:47 -0000

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Walter Hop wrote:

WH>2. Will it be reasonably safe to run 5.2-RELEASE on sparc64? An i386 5.1R
WH>   box with similar usage is now 62 days up without a glitch, are uptimes
WH>   such as these expected?

I have a server running on an Ultra 10 that has now 70 days uptime. It
serves a group of 15 people with KDE and Linux stuff from a vinum raid0.

WH>4. What is the future plan for support of low-end sparc64 in FreeBSD?
WH>   Are there enough people interested in these setups to keep them on the
WH>   roadmap for the near future?

I hope so.

harti
-- 
harti brandt,
http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private
brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de, harti@freebsd.org