Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 15:24:29 +0000 From: bz-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 188995] [NEW PORT] revive port devel/codeville - a distributed version control system, uses python Message-ID: <bug-188995-13-lPZSroxEaQ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-188995-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-188995-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188995 --- Comment #6 from C Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> --- (In reply to John Marino from comment #4) > er, um. > > acknowledging this is a 10-second scan: > > 1) "COMMENT= An anarchic control version system without unnecessary > re-merges" > portlint doesn't complain about that? Did you run portlint? > > 2) i don't understand hardcoding WITHOUT_PSYCO=yes > Why not: > A) remove this line > B) remove pre-everything target (warning makes no sense if psyco is not an > option) > C) remove the .ifndef(WITHOUT_PSYCO) entire section > > Are you trying to preserve psycho functionality? chances are this port will > be removed (it should have already been removed IMO) > > and WITH_* knobs are basically frowned upon nowadays > > I thought you were going to remove all traces of psyco, what is it that you > want to do with it? Ugh. Yes. I'm afraid this was a bit of a quickie. I have a meeting I need to attend shortly. I was hoping to get [this] back in the tree. So that I could manage the whole thing through svn(1). As I am /far/ more accustomed to that route. Sorry. If you prefer, I'll take the time to re-do the whole mess, and post another (correct) shar(1) file here. --Chris -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-188995-13-lPZSroxEaQ>