Date: Mon, 01 May 2023 11:40:38 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 271156] graphics/imlib2: Fix X11 dependency (third time) Message-ID: <bug-271156-7788-aAulVVB9o7@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-271156-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-271156-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D271156 --- Comment #2 from fsbruva@yahoo.com --- (In reply to Mina Gali=C4=87 from comment #1) Good point. The issue is not during imlib2 build, as the ports Makefile correctly passes --without-x to configure, and all is well. The problem is that the unmodified Imlib2.h gets installed to ${LOCALBASE}/include. Dependent programs that #include Imlib2.h need to ALSO set X_DISPLAY_MISSING, but may not know they need to. Within Imlib2.h, there are numerous function prototypes that are also protected by #ifndef X_DISPLAY_MISSING, because when imlib2 was build built, the --without-x influenced the build. My thought is that once the Imlib2.h is installed, it should reflect the library as installed. To this end, defining X_DISPLAY_MISSING seemed like t= he easiest and simplest method to ensure success for dependent ports. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-271156-7788-aAulVVB9o7>