From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Feb 20 16:19:21 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from blizzard.sabbo.net (smtp.sabbo.net [193.193.218.18])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C4A2737B491; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 16:19:13 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from max@vic.sabbo.net)
Received: from vic.sabbo.net (root@vic.sabbo.net [193.193.218.112])
	by blizzard.sabbo.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f1L0J5D12620;
	Wed, 21 Feb 2001 02:19:07 +0200
Received: (from max@localhost)
	by vic.sabbo.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f1L0JFj30210;
	Wed, 21 Feb 2001 02:19:15 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org)
From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG>
Message-Id: <200102210019.f1L0JFj30210@vic.sabbo.net>
Subject: Re: Proposal: PLIST filtering rules
To: clefevre@poboxes.com
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 02:19:09 +0200 (EET)
Cc: sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG (Maxim Sobolev), ports@FreeBSD.ORG,
	asami@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <7l2lm0yc.fsf@gits.dyndns.org> from "Cyrille Lefevre" at Feb 20, 2001 11:41:47 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> 
> Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> writes:
> 
> > It most cases it could be simplified even further:
> > --*bsd.port.mk*--
> > .if defined(NOPORTDOCS)
> > PLIST_FOUT?= "^share/doc/${PORTNAME}" "^@dirrm share/doc/${PORTNAME}"
> > .endif
> 
> PKGBASE would be more appropiate, no ?
> 
> for example :
> 
> cd /usr/ports/archivers/gtar
> make -V PORTNAME -V PKGBASE
> tar
> gtar

It's details. I rather would like comments on a proposal as a whole, not
on my sample code.

-Maxim

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message