From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu May 18 21:11:38 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id VAA11380 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 18 May 1995 21:11:38 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAA11372 for ; Thu, 18 May 1995 21:11:36 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id VAA09502; Thu, 18 May 1995 21:11:28 -0700 Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 21:11:28 -0700 Message-Id: <199505190411.VAA09502@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: adhir@iagi.net CC: aledm@pavilion.co.uk, hackers@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: (adhir@iagi.net) Subject: Re: ram-speed (was Re: Adaptec 2940?) From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * Some more data points: * * Bigdipper (ASUS SP3G, 486dx2/66, 40mb RAM, 512k cache, 1.1.5.1) * * 49005fb0 0.309 uS/op 3.23e+06 op/S 12.327 Mb/S * 8938c0df 0.159 uS/op 6.31e+06 op/S 24.066 Mb/S * * * Littledipper (ASUS SP3G, 486dx2/66, 32mb RAM, 512k cache, -current) * * 49005fb0 0.312 uS/op 3.21e+06 op/S 12.233 Mb/S * 8938c0df 0.158 uS/op 6.32e+06 op/S 24.112 Mb/S * * * (BTW - both machines were pretty heavily loaded at the time... Not sure * if it makes a difference) Here goes mine. silvia (SI54P AIO (SiS 85C* chipset), P-90, 32mb RAM, 256K $, -current) 49005fb0 0.418 uS/op 2.39e+06 op/S 9.121 Mb/S 8938c0df 0.170 uS/op 5.89e+06 op/S 22.462 Mb/S The machine was completely idle. Oh boy. ;< Satoshi