From owner-freebsd-current Thu Oct 10 01:28:47 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id BAA29461 for current-outgoing; Thu, 10 Oct 1996 01:28:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nike.efn.org (resnet.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.28]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA29455 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 1996 01:28:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nike.efn.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id BAA11386 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 1996 01:28:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 10 Oct 1996 01:28:31 -0700 (PDT) From: John-Mark Gurney X-Sender: jmg@nike Reply-To: John-Mark Gurney To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: libz in current Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I am helping a friend install a 0801 system... (this was before the 1006 snap was released)... and as it is pretty current ;).. I've been using the ports and packages from current... is there a reason for uping the shared lib version of libz? the one I have from the package of old 2.1.5 or there abouts is something like 1.3 I think.. is there any difference? also... why is the default for shared libs 2.0? I'm thinking it's that freebsd is in it's 2.x series... but then libz's shared lib version should of been over written... thanks for your comments... ttyl... John-Mark gurney_j@efn.org http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/ Modem/FAX: (541) 683-6954 (FreeBSD Box) Live in Peace, destroy Micro$oft, support free software, run FreeBSD (unix)