From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 22 09:08:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F15116A4CE; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:08:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail2out.barnet.com.au (mail2out.barnet.com.au [202.83.176.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8960D43D39; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:08:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: by mail2out.barnet.com.au (Postfix, from userid 27) id 08B52707452; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:08:13 +1100 (EST) X-Viruscan-Id: <423FE07C000065621155C6@BarNet> Received: from mail2-auth.barnet.com.au (mail2.barnet.com.au [202.83.176.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) Authority" (verified OK)) by mail2.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F46707451; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:08:12 +1100 (EST) Received: from k7.mavetju (edwin-3.int.barnet.com.au [10.10.12.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) Certificate Authority" (verified OK)) by mail2-auth.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2447270744F; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:08:12 +1100 (EST) Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F280D6181; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:08:10 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:08:10 +1100 From: Edwin Groothuis To: Anton Berezin , Rong-En Fan , Marcus Grando , sem@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Cheng-Lung Sung Message-ID: <20050322090810.GY34807@k7.mavetju> References: <200503210441.j2L4fQRB021246@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> <20050322084911.GA21666@heechee.tobez.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050322084911.GA21666@heechee.tobez.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: mail/policyd name conflict X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:08:15 -0000 On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 09:49:11AM +0100, Anton Berezin wrote: > So I'd like to suggest to rename the existing mail/policyd to > mail/policyd-spf, for example. It might be a good idea to rename the > new port to mail/policyd-somethingelse anyway, if we can come up with a > sufficiently descriptive (and short!) "somethingelse" part. I would call them mail/postfix-policyd mail/postfix-policyd-spf But that is what you said already. If there are getting more which just are described as postfix "policyd" ports, just call them postfix-policyd-a, postfix-policyd-b and so on. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/