From owner-freebsd-security Sat Mar 30 16:50: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5D737B41A for ; Sat, 30 Mar 2002 16:50:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id BBCE35346; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 01:49:55 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: "Karsten W. Rohrbach" Cc: Mike Silbersack , Colin Percival , freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: It's time for those 2048-, 3072-, and 4096-bit keys? References: <5.0.2.1.1.20020326024955.02392830@popserver.sfu.ca> <20020326034234.Q10197-100000@patrocles.silby.com> <20020326185714.F22539@mail.webmonster.de> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 31 Mar 2002 01:49:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20020326185714.F22539@mail.webmonster.de> Message-ID: Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "Karsten W. Rohrbach" writes: > shouldn't the v1 protocol be killed anyway? Some systems (like the SparcStation 5 that serves DNS, DHCP and NTP requests from my home network) are too slow for the algorithms used by ssh2. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message