From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jan 14 15:54:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43FC537B402; Sun, 14 Jan 2001 15:53:55 -0800 (PST) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA24613; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 00:53:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Julian Elischer Cc: Jun Kuriyama , net@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADSUP! New netgraph code coming References: <3A5567A7.A11F47E3@elischer.org> <3A566BCB.BFD6FA2D@elischer.org> <7m1yu9mdlt.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp> <3A5F1788.9AD8509A@elischer.org> <3A6233E7.E47F2E04@elischer.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 15 Jan 2001 00:53:45 +0100 In-Reply-To: Julian Elischer's message of "Sun, 14 Jan 2001 15:19:03 -0800" Message-ID: Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Julian Elischer writes: > Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Something is terribly broken with ng_ether at the moment. It lacks a > > MODULE_VERSION line. > is this required for something to be a depency? Yes. > Where is it documented? It's not, AFAIK. UTSL (like the rest of us) DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message