From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 6 15:36:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2346016A41B; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 15:36:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062D413C468; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 15:36:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD404A712; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:36:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 15:36:04 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Ivan Voras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080106141157.I105@fledge.watson.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: When will ZFS become stable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 15:36:06 -0000 On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Ivan Voras wrote: > As far as I know about the details of implementation and what would it take > to fix the problems, is it safe to assume ZFS will never become stable > during 7.x lifetime? I'm not sure if anyone has mentioned this yet in the thread, but another thing worth taking into account in considering the stability of ZFS is whether or not Sun considers it a production feature in Solaris. Last I heard, it was still considered an experimental feature there as well. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge