Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:01:48 +0800 From: Jiawei Ye <leafy7382@gmail.com> To: Craig Boston <craig@yekse.gank.org>, "Michael C. Shultz" <ringworm01@gmail.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why does security/amavisd-new depend on db3? Message-ID: <c21e92e20511142301s17c6e85fm19681c08c5ba8b2f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20051115065211.GB35001@nowhere> References: <c21e92e20511130557g4ad76176l85beb6ceee078886@mail.gmail.com> <200511142145.05316.ringworm01@gmail.com> <c21e92e20511142201o70752d66p20b4ef233612d6e@mail.gmail.com> <20051115065211.GB35001@nowhere>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/15/05, Craig Boston <craig@yekse.gank.org> wrote:
> If that works, it's not necessarily portmanager's fault but rather a bug
> (feature?) in the ports system.
>
> Craig
>
I think you are right. Another instance of this (mis)feature happens
on my machine with apache-ant, depending on JDK15 in my case. I have
WITH_MOZILLA=3Dfirefox for my jdk15 but apache-ant insists that it will
depend on mozilla.
Jiawei
--
"Without the userland, the kernel is useless."
--inspired by The Tao of Programming
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c21e92e20511142301s17c6e85fm19681c08c5ba8b2f>