From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Sep 27 11:00:43 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA22143 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 11:00:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA22114 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 11:00:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA10119; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 10:57:42 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199609271757.KAA10119@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Weirdness with routing to freefall. To: imp@village.org (Warner Losh) Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 10:57:42 -0700 (MST) Cc: mrcpu@cdsnet.net, hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199609271458.IAA04921@rover.village.org> from "Warner Losh" at Sep 27, 96 08:58:30 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > : Well, I don't know that I have too much to add to this discussion, > : although a traceroute to freefall was mildly amusing. > : My old connection to Sprint via Anaheim was much shorter. > > I'm on the SPRINTLINK outage mailing list. The problem is that there > is a T-1 between sprint and CIX, which services CRL. This T1 is so > overloaded that the routing update messages aren't getting through, so > all of sprintlink thinks that the link has gone done and returns Host > unreachables once you hit the internal core of sprintlink. There is > no eta for correction of this problem. :-( I heard it would be fixed when enough companies changed to a provider other than Sprint, siting that as the reason for the change. 8-|. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.