From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 17 09:39:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6099316A40F for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 09:39:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@rulez.sk) Received: from virtual.micronet.sk (smtp.micronet.sk [84.16.32.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A357E43D5A for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 09:39:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danger@rulez.sk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by virtual.micronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C4A10E670; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:39:31 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at virtual.micronet.sk Received: from virtual.micronet.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (virtual.micronet.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xllGUiz3K+fu; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:39:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from danger.mcrn.sk (danger.mcrn.sk [84.16.37.254]) by virtual.micronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB0B10E66F; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:39:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:39:55 +0200 From: Daniel Gerzo X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1678007122.20060917113955@rulez.sk> To: Alban Hertroys In-Reply-To: <0AE8B3AB-1709-4724-94C8-D25558B27EFF@solfertje.student.utwente.nl> References: <20060909173813.GA1388@FS.denninger.net> <45065C67.6040503@cs.tu-berlin.de> <4509A7ED.4090701@cs.tu-berlin.de> <0AE8B3AB-1709-4724-94C8-D25558B27EFF@solfertje.student.utwente.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, "hackmiester \(Hunter Fuller\)" Subject: Re[2]: arrrrgh! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's gmirror code?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Gerzo List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 09:39:59 -0000 Hello Alban, Friday, September 15, 2006, 9:44:07 AM, you wrote: > On Sep 15, 2006, at 24:34, hackmiester (Hunter Fuller) wrote: >>>> Hahahahaha... That's ironic... >>> >>> That wasn't meant to be ironic. Years of experience and >>> observations of development lead to this conclusion. >> >> RIght. All i can say, though, is that someone that doesn't know any >> better would probably not think "Oh! That means that upgrades are >> possible between releases, and not that my system will actually >> run, or anything!" >> It just seems it'd be quite a cause of confusion. > So, actually Microsoft may be correctly claiming that WindowsXP is > more stable than Linux. That it spontaneously reboots as soon as I > bore it isn't related at all... Your Windows must be really badly broken, because my Windows XP spontaneously rebooted only once in those many years I have been using it. In my opinion, XP is pretty decent system. -- Best regards, Daniel mailto:danger@rulez.sk