From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Apr 4 1:17: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from yellow.rahul.net (yellow.rahul.net [192.160.13.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49C937B686 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 01:16:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dhesi@rahul.net) Received: by yellow.rahul.net (Postfix, from userid 104) id 158557C2C; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 01:16:49 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: do acregmin, acregmax, acdirmin, acdirmax work as documented Newsgroups: a2i.lists.freebsd-stable References: X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.6 (NOV) Message-Id: <20000404081649.158557C2C@yellow.rahul.net> Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 01:16:49 -0700 (PDT) From: dhesi@rahul.net (Rahul Dhesi) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Doug Barton writes: > You will get better results, and more likely to get help if you update >the server machine to 3.4-Stable, or better yet, 4.0-Stable. There are >so many bugs in the old NFS code, it would be hard to know where to >start. I could of course do that. But I am afraid that a month or two later you will, or soembody else will, tell me that 3.4 or 4.0 are too unreliable to be used and I should use 3.5 or 4.x instead. And so on. And I then I will be so busy upgrading I will never get any real work done. And besides, the attribute cache is supposed to be on the client only, not on the server, and the client is already running 3.4-STABLE. -- Rahul Dhesi (spam-filtered with RSS and ORBS) See my ORBS faq: http://www.rahul.net/dhesi/orbs.faq.txt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message