From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 18 18:56:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA354106566C for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:56:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gonzo@hq.bluezbox.com) Received: from hq.bluezbox.com (hq.bluezbox.com [70.38.37.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9573D8FC0C for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:56:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by hq.bluezbox.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.73 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1SKa3N-000OhZ-LL for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:56:38 -0700 Message-ID: <4F8F0E6A.20809@bluezbox.com> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:56:42 -0700 From: Oleksandr Tymoshenko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <566771C2-84CA-4824-AE99-38EB5DE1F786@gmail.com> <20120414160028.00001573@unknown> <6D27E8DF-67E6-4084-8B88-4CD9F9900B8F@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gonzo@hq.bluezbox.com X-Spam-Level: ---- X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "hq.bluezbox.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see The administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 17/04/2012 12:11 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 17 April 2012 01:44, Sevan / Venture37 wrote: > >>> A part (the simple one) of >>> the code has been reviewed. Anyone interested in getting KDTRACE_HOOKS >>> enabled by default is free to do an independent review and post it here. >> >> >> Adam Leventhal on KDTRACE_HOOKS >> https://twitter.com/ahl/statuses/192027893319221248 > > Let's get Adam to write up a summary and post it here. We'll then flip > the switch. [...] Content analysis details: (-4.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Subject: Re: DTrace on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:56:48 -0000 On 17/04/2012 12:11 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 17 April 2012 01:44, Sevan / Venture37 wrote: > >>> A part (the simple one) of >>> the code has been reviewed. Anyone interested in getting KDTRACE_HOOKS >>> enabled by default is free to do an independent review and post it here. >> >> >> Adam Leventhal on KDTRACE_HOOKS >> https://twitter.com/ahl/statuses/192027893319221248 > > Let's get Adam to write up a summary and post it here. We'll then flip > the switch. FWIW I gathered list of files opened by cc1 when building amd64 GENERIC with KDTRACE_HOOKS disabled and enabled (idea courtesy of brooks@). Here is the diff: http://people.freebsd.org/~gonzo/generic-hooks.diff Looks like no CDDL code is involved.