From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Oct 17 11:08:44 1995 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id LAA02206 for ports-outgoing; Tue, 17 Oct 1995 11:08:44 -0700 Received: from GndRsh.aac.dev.com (GndRsh.aac.dev.com [198.145.92.241]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA02188 ; Tue, 17 Oct 1995 11:08:29 -0700 Received: (from rgrimes@localhost) by GndRsh.aac.dev.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id LAA15751; Tue, 17 Oct 1995 11:08:13 -0700 From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <199510171808.LAA15751@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> Subject: Re: Full FREEZE on ports tree To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Date: Tue, 17 Oct 1995 11:08:13 -0700 (PDT) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199510170824.BAA07260@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami" at Oct 17, 95 01:24:52 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 982 Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > > Hello ports world, > > It seems like some people just don't get it. I'm hereby declaring a > full code freeze of the ports tree, as well as bsd.port.mk. The first I can agree with the second I can not (at least not in -current). The bsd.port.mk file that is important to you is the one in the RELENG branch. You _should_ be using a RELENG_2_1_0 system to build and test all the ports on, thus what happens in -current should not effect your work. If you are not using a RELENG_2_1_0 build system your makeing a grave mistake IMHO. > Nothing is to be committed to this area without my consent from now on > until the release of 2.1. If you want to change something, please > send me a note. > > Violation of this will result in revoking of your commit priviledge. > > Thanks for your cooperation. > > Satoshi > -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Reliable computers for FreeBSD