From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 1 02:28:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 219C0106566B for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 02:28:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanefbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pw0-f54.google.com (mail-pw0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B178FC33 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 02:28:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwj7 with SMTP id 7so1528842pwj.13 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 18:28:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=sYDr9dVZAMJvPLdIg/hhl/Nig/mdU5H6UbGmQEMxiic=; b=nbjW8BXMJ94VyTSa6rTGytZiErB8Cz6k/JegVfhF+olsBYodZmgj1SvlETzalDKC+b L90hFxqXY8nES7+ixYt9T6Z1aAvET2VRS7xEI0Xtfm8nSSmyt0/zyvPPlnB2NZr51h4E PyFf4fvuUEA5qLXUzSuN/pyc43J8hB97eDtZI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=J5c09nUyUNzdXfmfL/tei+3L40KXZxDQ8pIcJF6ABuG4b09uEa57DB3VNZFhGbcjLq K5Fl9/U6FF9M7CKKcW0kv4GkWqejlpA6q1u3Or2uqPy0/pfn3OpS00XztNE1uXtYMzjU E+RGe9aSKhZq/3nx2oJDPWUwVBswmSEWaKDgw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.152.5 with SMTP id z5mr2131065wfd.263.1267410495720; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 18:28:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 18:28:15 -0800 Message-ID: <7d6fde3d1002281828hb5278d9sbb7a07f790b0da@mail.gmail.com> From: Garrett Cooper To: jhell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Alexander Best , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [patch] extending {amd64|i386} cpu info X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 02:28:19 -0000 On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 5:43 PM, jhell wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:19, alexbestms@ wrote: >> >> hi there, >> >> i always forget how to decipher model and family from the cpu id. of >> course >> there're 3rd party tools to do that for you, but instead i decided to hack >> the >> kernel. ;) >> >> maybe somebody finds these changes useful. >> >> cheers. >> alex >> > > > What about the other arch's ? I only see i386 and amd64. I would think if > this functionality is going to "make it in" that it should be done > consistantly across the board, the way it is now. This is trivial enough of a change that I think it should be done for amd64/i386. I say that because it may be a bit more difficult for arm, mips, powerpc, sparc64, etc (probably not as much...). Thanks, -Garrett