From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 07:37:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41186D47; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:37:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ea0-f182.google.com (mail-ea0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3D28FC12; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:37:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ea0-f182.google.com with SMTP id a14so567232eaa.13 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:37:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=RYMggbkKRMVRCnvajZgK4L/SMBVU0WsFCzKObHwlPZA=; b=b5pVp+x9jT5fHiQ3thXHno/Ks0I0sGClh8kPbMh31oPI6LnR/GaQ7mqdPwb+uBtrYH MD2+VzqvuBckxb5ZIOol9+ufmIyEge+5ygfzTufFXf4bHJVkb+osPWYiVz+WaPFukXMs t+ufFqok0Z9qu3Aj9ONqb7h01Kdlzrs6jW6S/H0dLdN/gwM7CyOQfuS7fvmFdNFlenUt MslnMEQ54sf7YRbQTKh9I+Apu1MLLVSQkZC5KxzPyvIIfn4r9Y7gn392fhShw5Li5/+K VfHqEMHRMPderc+u7Z/O5o/7tWR8MnX0vphcE7/yamcMNVAqYySmqFwSDFeuHK1kwEky 0djg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.221.5 with SMTP id q5mr2765037eep.33.1355384233207; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:37:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.198.71 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:37:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50C975B3.7070701@FreeBSD.org> References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C412F6.7040300@sdf.org> <201212090526.26535.lumiwa@gmail.com> <50C8CF77.2040102@FreeBSD.org> <50C975B3.7070701@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 01:37:13 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? From: Scot Hetzel To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:37:15 -0000 On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 12/12/2012 23:17, Walter Hurry wrote: >> That looks like a useful feature. But why is it saying this? >> >> pkg: (firefox-17.0.1,1) shared library libxpcom.so not found >> pkg: (firefox-17.0.1,1) shared library libmozalloc.so not found >> (lots more output snipped) >> >> $ locate libxpcom.so >> /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxpcom.so >> $ locate libmozalloc.so >> /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozalloc.so >> $ file /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxpcom.so >> /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxpcom.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, >> version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked, stripped >> $ file /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozalloc.so >> /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozalloc.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, >> x86-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked, stripped >> $ > > Ah -- that would be a bug. At a guess, it's not finding the shlibs > because they're in a location not on the usual path and there's > something odd about the RPATH settings in the binaries. I shall > investigate further. > This same issue with firefox was reported in this PR: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=131237 And included a simple fix which was rejected by the firefox maintainer due to firefox sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH at runtime to find its share libraries. -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were maimed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.