From owner-cvs-all Thu Feb 25 23:22:28 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from picalon.gun.de (picalon.gun.de [192.109.159.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B877314ECF; Thu, 25 Feb 1999 23:22:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.gtn.com) Received: from klemm.gtn.com (pppak04.gtn.com [194.231.123.169]) by picalon.gun.de (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id IAA24016; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 08:22:00 +0100 (MET) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by klemm.gtn.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id IAA66269; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 08:21:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andreas) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 08:21:44 +0100 From: Andreas Klemm To: Andreas Klemm Cc: Kris Kennaway , Andreas Klemm , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, Alex Zepeda Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/qt142 Makefile ports/x11-toolkits/qt142/patches patch-aa Message-ID: <19990226082144.A66227@titan.klemm.gtn.com> References: <199902250825.AAA46317@freefall.freebsd.org> <19990226074047.A65110@titan.klemm.gtn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i In-Reply-To: <19990226074047.A65110@titan.klemm.gtn.com>; from Andreas Klemm on Fri, Feb 26, 1999 at 07:40:47AM +0100 X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE SMP Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Fri, Feb 26, 1999 at 07:40:47AM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote: > kde has some nice GL screensavers. So kde is build with Mesa anyway. > So what's the big deal, to let qt ``as it is''. > > People, this is driving me a little nuts. If somebody would please > take over qt142 port. > > Thank you. This sound a little bit p*****, here the more worked out answer. I have not much time because of "real life" job. So I want to concentrate on really necessary things. I'd suggest, that you bug qt people, to make separate thingies out of it and then we make two ports. Currently I could live with it "as it is". BTW, people we live in the century of 128 MB RAM and >= 10.2 GB IDE disks, aren't we ? And this even runs on 32/2 GB. So I really don't understand this all. QT is a pure desktop thing, so please don't try to play the "we speak about server performance" with me ;-) If you are really not satisfied with this, then I would like to give people with more time the advantage to take over maintainership of the qt port. I don't want to hinder developement, but I repeat it again, have no time for such extra work. Andreas /// -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas What gives you 90% more speed, for example, in kernel compilation ? http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html "NT = Not Today" (Maggie Biggs) ``powered by FreeBSD SMP'' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message