Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 12:13:28 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r305135 - head/ports-mgmt/pkg Message-ID: <5069CF38.6040003@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20121001170630.GF70616@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <201210011633.q91GXKPO079069@svn.freebsd.org> <5069C8FE.4040405@FreeBSD.org> <20121001170630.GF70616@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/1/2012 12:06 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 11:46:54AM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> On 10/1/2012 11:33 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> Author: bapt >>> Date: Mon Oct 1 16:33:19 2012 >>> New Revision: 305135 >>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/305135 >>> >>> Log: >>> Mark as not ccache safe >>> >>> Reported by: Piotr Kubaj <pkubaj@gmail.com> >>> >> >> >> How is this not ccache safe? >> >> The WITH_CCACHE_BUILD support does not break any ports as it just >> updates PATH, and I have been using ccache on pkg for months now fine. >> >> Bryan > > I received at least 2 reports of users saying it is not ccache safe. > > I manage to build it with ccache activated, but I imagine there should be rough > edges and trust the users saying it doesn't work for them. > > regards, > Bapt > Still this is odd. I wonder if they are using custom ccache setup. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery bdrewery@freenode/EFNet
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5069CF38.6040003>