From owner-freebsd-current Sun Apr 6 21:31:51 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA18076 for current-outgoing; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 21:31:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA18042 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 21:31:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from waru.life.nthu.edu.tw (root@waru.feminism.net [140.114.98.107]) by who.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id RAA27461 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 17:11:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from waru.life.nthu.edu.tw (frankch@waru.feminism.net [140.114.98.107]) by waru.life.nthu.edu.tw (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA05209; Mon, 7 Apr 1997 08:13:02 +0800 (CST) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 1997 08:13:02 +0800 (CST) From: Frank Chen Hsiung Chan To: Brian Tao cc: FREEBSD-CURRENT-L Subject: Re: XFree86 3.2 causes constant 1.0 load average? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 6 Apr 1997, Brian Tao wrote: > Has anyone else noticed that XFree86 3.2 will in many cases (but > not always) cause a 2.2 or 3.0 system to report a load average of at > least 1.0? ps/top both indicate little or no CPU activity, but the > load average does not fall below 1.0 unless I kill off X. We had this problem here. We then found that the asclock is responsible for this. Try not running asclock and/or other asstuff, that might help. --frank