From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Oct  2 08:02:30 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA13652
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 2 Oct 1996 08:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.tfs.com ([140.145.230.252])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA13639;
          Wed, 2 Oct 1996 08:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA03574; Wed, 2 Oct 1996 17:01:40 +0200 (MET DST)
To: Jim Reid <jim.reid@eurocontrol.be>
cc: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>,
        James Graham <greywolf@siva.captech.com>,
        "Kevin P. Neal" <kpneal@pobox.com>, hackers@freebsd.org,
        tech-kern@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: VPS mailing list, BSD interest? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 02 Oct 1996 16:41:11 +0200."
             <2079.844267271@heron.pst.cfmu.eurocontrol.be> 
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 1996 17:01:40 +0200
Message-ID: <3572.844268500@critter.tfs.com>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <2079.844267271@heron.pst.cfmu.eurocontrol.be>, Jim Reid writes:
>    James Graham <greywolf@siva.captech.com> wrote:
>
>    >> # >What, aside from extendable partitions, would LVM give us
>    >> # >over CCD?
>    >> # Architecture instead of hacks.
>    >> Methinks I detect a hint of elitism in that statement.
>
>Indeed. It's not as if LVM is the epitome of stylish or elegant code
>anyway....

Just to clarify: my comment (Architecture instead of hacks.) doesn't
apply to any implementation of a LVM but to the general principle
of one compared to CCD.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@ref.tfs.com       TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.