From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 00:58:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D10FAC7; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:58:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x22a.google.com (mail-pa0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC0A2780; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:58:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id lj1so922223pab.15 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:58:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=zzReK7VHVwHNOHu5zrkDoO8QX19EBS3ObU0BBqmWWAY=; b=ZZ6Cs1WCTY9jBQejLrmu/bXO0X9BW4+/Jsltoqj0pBtHBt+OEWVoWamplQx74hm5Mw D7sn4I7F3p3CnLPIdTbXqf82HfrDUQCkAW1HD8+8s+Fkfm7Sh840hQra1y+N2gwQutd/ RcJ8D3NjVTrIogoVZDR3J6/QyrB3ZnKJcqTO07DSZyWoAvrFRaSG8O8/qR37RIPtUFFZ X+ZtTBE2xVxRFJYHpl7bt9Z3PGfmVXxQiHkyb+gvF926vo+3rv3agOrzw95r9ndtxucY MDcFOBDmcxLZ5q7YAiszAD2nQfA+PUhwIbORz1VXuA3diziEA+uYSmS+eFexobHCoMUJ yMUA== X-Received: by 10.68.132.225 with SMTP id ox1mr54408814pbb.99.1410915486460; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:58:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pyunyh@gmail.com ([106.247.248.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o4sm15208326pdh.56.2014.09.16.17.58.02 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:58:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Yonghyeon PYUN X-Google-Original-From: "Yonghyeon PYUN" Received: by pyunyh@gmail.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:57:53 +0900 Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:57:53 +0900 To: Brett Glass Subject: Re: jme interface bounces up and down, up and down.... Message-ID: <20140917005753.GA1102@michelle.fasterthan.com> Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com References: <201409141629.KAA29705@mail.lariat.net> <20140915060819.GA967@michelle.fasterthan.com> <201409151447.IAA08325@mail.lariat.net> <20140916083749.GA988@michelle.fasterthan.com> <201409161727.LAA25854@mail.lariat.net> <201409162353.RAA00829@mail.lariat.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201409162353.RAA00829@mail.lariat.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: questions@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:58:07 -0000 On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 05:53:51PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote: > At 05:27 PM 9/16/2014, Chris Hill wrote: > > >On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Brett Glass wrote: > > > >>So, what is the best solution? I cannot throw out the machine, and > >>because I am using a VLAN switch to multiplex the port to three LANs > >>I do not want to reduce the speed to 100 Mbps. Ideas? > > > >The man page mentioned says that if "the link partner enabled the > >IEEE 802.3az Energy Efficient Ethernet feature, the controller > >will not be able to establish a 1000baseT link." Maybe disable > >802.3az on that port, if you can. Just a thought. > > It's a Netgear "green" switch, model GS105E. It has no way to disable > 802.3az. > Then, probably the only available option to establish a link against the switch would be using reduced speed(100Mbps) with ifconfig(8). If you can't reduce the speed due to other reasons I'm afraid there is no way to establish a link at this moment. As I said in previous mail, did you check what resolved speed Linux shows? Also it would be good idea to know whether you're really seeing the PHY hardware issue or not. Directly connect the jme(4) to other box without switch and see whether jme(4) can establish a 1000baseT link. > --Brett >