From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Dec 24 23:20:06 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5240D16A41F
	for <freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org>; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 23:20:06 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B570843D53
	for <freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org>; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 23:20:05 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBONK5nZ087251
	for <freebsd-rc@freefall.freebsd.org>; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 23:20:05 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jBONK5W2087250;
	Sat, 24 Dec 2005 23:20:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 23:20:05 GMT
Message-Id: <200512242320.jBONK5W2087250@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org
From: Peter Much <pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: conf/85363: syntax error in /etc/rc.d/devfs
X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Peter Much <pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org>
List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation."
	<freebsd-rc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-rc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-rc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 23:20:06 -0000

The following reply was made to PR conf/85363; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Peter Much <pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org>
To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: conf/85363: syntax error in /etc/rc.d/devfs
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 23:58:10 +0100

 Now I found time to analyze this thoroughly. 
 
 I found that I have made a mistake. It just does not work to name a
 ruleset by its NUMBER in rc.conf, instead one must always name it by
 its NAME. (And, btw, that name must not begin with a number!)
 
 Now, ideally, if one mentions the number instead of the name in rc.conf,
 the code should behave as if a nonexistent ruleset was mentioned -
 i.e. do nothing or raise an error.
 Practically it does behave undefined, that is, wrong rulesets will 
 silently be applied.
 
 But, overall, this is one of the implicit weaknesses of  shell
 scripting, when strings that are to be freely defined by the installer
 are used as variable names.
 And as the thing is designed as it is, there is no easy solution 
 to make it better.
 
 An improvement will be the usage of {} delimiters. A construct
 like "eval rs=\$$1" will behave less undefined if it is  written as
 "eval rs=\${$1}". There is a couple of places in rc.subr where this
 would be argueable.
 
 PMc