Date: Thu, 5 Feb 1998 18:38:11 +1100 (EST) From: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> To: tlambert@primenet.com (Terry Lambert) Cc: jb@cimlogic.com.au, tlambert@primenet.com, dyson@FreeBSD.ORG, perlsta@sunyit.edu, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: implementing linux's clone() Message-ID: <199802050738.SAA08234@cimlogic.com.au> In-Reply-To: <199802050717.AAA09693@usr08.primenet.com> from Terry Lambert at "Feb 5, 98 07:17:46 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert wrote: > How does the final spec differ from draft 10? The O'Reilly book > claims that draft 10 is identical (it calls it the final spec). I believe that to be true. 1003.1c Draft 10 (September 1994) was a set of patches to 1003.1b. The published standard neatly combines 1003.1-1990, 1003.1b-1993, 1003.1c-1995 into one 743 page document. Regards, -- John Birrell - jb@cimlogic.com.au; jb@netbsd.org; jb@freebsd.org CIMlogic Pty Ltd, GPO Box 117A, Melbourne Vic 3001, Australia +61 418 353 137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199802050738.SAA08234>