From owner-freebsd-bugs Sat Apr 11 15:11:52 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA18584 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Sat, 11 Apr 1998 15:11:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (ppp-206-170-6-248.rdcy01.pacbell.net [206.170.6.248]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA18565 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 1998 15:11:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pst@Shockwave.COM) Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA18421; Sat, 11 Apr 1998 15:11:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pst@precipice.shockwave.com) Message-Id: <199804112211.PAA18421@precipice.shockwave.com> To: Peter Wemm cc: bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/6274: panic: handle_workitem_freeblocks: block count (softupdates) In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 11 Apr 1998 18:08:48 +0800." <199804111008.SAA17174@spinner.netplex.com.au> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1998 15:11:27 -0700 From: Paul Traina Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org My advice at the moment is that softupdates are not ready for prime time yet. Hmm, actually, no, the softupdates stuff itself seems fine, but the hooks into the kernel are not finished. Our VM/bio system works significantly differently to traditional 4.4lite* systems, so a few of the softupdate's assumptions are challenged. ACK. Would the vmcore and kernel -g be helpful? If not, let me know and I'll nuke 'em. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message