From owner-freebsd-current Mon Oct 19 16:08:45 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA00882 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 19 Oct 1998 16:08:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from nu.binary.net (nu.binary.net [12.13.120.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA00868 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 1998 16:08:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nathan@matrix.binary.net) Received: from matrix.binary.net (nathan@matrix.binary.net [12.13.120.2]) by nu.binary.net (8.9.1a/8.9.0) with ESMTP id SAA28477; Mon, 19 Oct 1998 18:08:14 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from nathan@localhost) by matrix.binary.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id SAA12921; Mon, 19 Oct 1998 18:08:13 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <19981019190813.C10530@rtfm.net> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1998 19:08:13 -0400 From: Nathan Dorfman To: "Kenneth D. Merry" , Andreas Klemm Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: packet writing ( was Re: 3.0-R, CAM, and audio tracks (more info)) References: <19981019223322.B17441@klemm.gtn.com> <199810192103.PAA25261@panzer.plutotech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <199810192103.PAA25261@panzer.plutotech.com>; from Kenneth D. Merry on Mon, Oct 19, 1998 at 03:03:44PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Oct 19, 1998 at 03:03:44PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > Andreas Klemm wrote... > > > > BTW, what about "packet writing" ? > > I really like this feature in Windoof environment. > > Would there be any possibility to implement this mode > > and to format/fixate by using a sysctl command or such ? > > And this is something that cdrecord won't do? cdrecord is the only > supported way of burning CDs under CAM. > > I may implement a more generic solution through the CD driver at some > point, but it probably won't be anytime soon. cdrecord-1.6 documents an "experimental" packet writing interface. Can someone clue me in as to what this is and the advantages/drawbacks of it? All I've heard about it is my cousin's rant about dragging and dropping to the CD in lose9x I fail to see a good reason for an OS-specific in-kernel CD-R driver, when the cdrecord package works on plenty of systems that have SCSI generic devices (passthrough). Unless I am missing some advantage of having CD burning code in the kernel, this strikes me as a horrible duplication of effort. So, what am I missing and why is this a good idea? :) > Ken > -- > Kenneth Merry > ken@plutotech.com -- ________________ ___________________________________________ / Nathan Dorfman \ / "`IE4 brings the web to UNIX'? *laughing* / nathan@rtfm.net \/ Isn't that similar to Ronald McDonald bringing / finger for PGP key \ religion to the pope?" -Jamie Bowden To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message