From owner-freebsd-small Mon Jan 11 00:13:52 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA27196 for freebsd-small-outgoing; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 00:13:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from korin.warman.org.pl (korin.nask.waw.pl [195.187.243.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA27157 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 00:13:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from abial@nask.pl) Received: from localhost (abial@localhost) by korin.warman.org.pl (8.9.1/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA14622; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 09:19:19 +0100 (CET) X-Authentication-Warning: korin.warman.org.pl: abial owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 09:19:19 +0100 (CET) From: Andrzej Bialecki X-Sender: abial@korin.warman.org.pl To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai cc: William McVey , freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Questions related to IPSec & bad link on http://www.freebsd. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 11 Jan 1999, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > On 10-Jan-99 William McVey wrote: > > > Second, I wanted to see if anyone has done any investigation into > > adapting the PicoBSD router configurations to support IPSec? In > > particular, I was wondering if anyone has any experience getting > > the KAME (http://www.kame.net/) IPv6 networking code squeezed into > > a bootable floppy. > > Not yet. Because CURRENT will soon adopt the KAME/INRIA code into the > source tree. That will ease a lot of pico's development. You mean: regarding use of IPv6. Otherwise - not quite :-) > Btw, Andrzej, that softupdates is cool, might be an even better thing if we > could put it to work with pico, then it's a megafast OS. Although, anyone > tried this on one of those Flashdisks as they're called? (I think) Softupdates is under very specific copyright, that's one thing. The other thing is that its strength is when _writing_ a lot of data to the disks. As for the flash disks: it's just a different media, nothing so special about it. Yes, the read access is extremely fast, but write speed is quite low. Perhaps here's where softupdates could help a little, but you would need to do some research how well they interact with speed and wear leveling algorithms used by flash vendors... Andrzej Bialecki -------------------- ++-------++ ------------------------------------- ||PicoBSD|| FreeBSD in your pocket? Go and see: Research & Academic |+-------+| "Small & Embedded FreeBSD" Network in Poland | |TT~~~| | http://www.freebsd.org/~picobsd/ -------------------- ~-+==---+-+ ------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message