Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Jun 1998 12:01:28 -0500
From:      Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To:        Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS Tensor Perth <shocking@ariadne.prth.tensor.pgs.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Clusters, Distributed File Systems and the like.
Message-ID:  <19980618120128.02047@papillon.lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <199806180307.LAA27243@ariadne.tensor.pgs.com>; from Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS Tensor Perth on Thu, Jun 18, 1998 at 11:07:21AM %2B0800
References:  <199806180307.LAA27243@ariadne.tensor.pgs.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 18 June 1998 at 11:07:21 +0800, Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS Tensor Perth wrote:
>
> I'm wondering if anyone has done some work on a distributed file system, where
> various nodes are each responsible for part of a filesystem and can see other
> node's part of the filesystem, with files being able to span more than one
> node. I think Greg Lehey's work (vinum) could be used as part of a solution.

Yes, one of the things on my wishlist is remote data replication.  If
you have any specific input, I'd be very interested.  If you're at the
AUUG winter conference in September, I'll be presenting a paper about
vinum there.

I'm currently at Compaq's Tandem Division in Austin, Texas, playing
around with their XC machines (up to 6 Proliant boxes, each with up to
4 PPros, running UnixWare and pretending to be a single system).
There's a lot of interesting stuff to be learnt there, too.  If I ever
get time, I might be interested in discussing the concept of
clustering under FreeBSD.

> The reason I ask is that I'm working for a geophysics data processing company,
> and we have all the 32 & 64 node IBM SP2 boxes floating about. Each node runs
> its own copy of AIX and has a couple of 9Gb disks, of which one is for the OS
> and the other is for the CFS (Common File System) which is shared between all
> the nodes in a system. It struck me as an interesting problem which has
> probably been solved a number of times. I'm in the process of porting our
> geophysical software to FreeBSD, which currently uses PVM and will soon be
> using MPI to distribute the processes among the nodes. I'm not expecting the
> performance to be within cooee of the SP2s, but it's an interesting exercide
> all the same.

Is your employer possibly interesting in funding some of this?

Greg
--
Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key
See complete headers for address and phone numbers

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980618120128.02047>