Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:38:27 -0500 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: vova@fbsd.ru Cc: gnome <freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Is GNOME 2.7/2.8 stable to you? Message-ID: <opsefvqd0o9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> In-Reply-To: <opsefpj3m99aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> References: <opseaqp2nq9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <1095151081.986.23.camel@localhost> <41471643.4000605@marcuscom.com> <1095244328.1246.21.camel@localhost> <opsedrs80j9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <1095321706.62780.27.camel@localhost> <opseewf6h49aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <1095328561.62780.40.camel@localhost> <opsefpj3m99aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 14:25:05 -0500, Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> wrote: > On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 13:56:01 +0400, Vladimir Grebenschikov > <vova@fbsd.ru> wrote: > >> В чт, 16/09/2004 в 03:56 -0500, Jeremy Messenger пишет: >> >> ... snip ... >>> > Yes, they suggest to ignore message - not looks good, I have remove >>> > plug-in and it helps, but see below >>> >>> Maybe, I can disable the 'unstable' plugins by default until someone >>> wants >>> to enable it with some knobs. >> >> Not bad idea >> >>> > turning off cups removes all these messages and make start of gumeric >>> > much faster (looks like gnumeric tries to connect all configured cups >>> > printers - seems strange) >>> >>> From what I noticed that you are having some problem with the printer >>> in >>> two apps (gnumeric and evolution) right? But, they behave different. >> >> Actually with turned off cups evolution print dialogue starts very fast. >> >> Looks like too long delay is cups related, most probably it caused by >> offline printers. > > Does this problem exists when you turn it on in the 'dummy' user? > >>> > But, after some rebuilds it refused to start at all under normal >>> user - >>> > it crashed >>> >>> Even crash on a 'dummy' user with no configuration files? How did you >>> rebuilt it? >> >> No, just created user - has only warning about plugin, no crash problem. >> so it is better to reset gconf database ? > > If you upgraded gnumeric2 from ports tree to marcuscom tree, then maybe > you can try to reset the gnumeric2 configuration file(s) first. If it > doesn't work, then reset the gconf. I don't know if you keep in track of marcuscom-devel, but I shall put it in here. Quoted by marcus: ===================================================== No settings need to be reinitialized when upgrading to 2.8 from 2.6. The GConf stuff changes were backed prior to 2.8, and even before then, there weren't _supposed_ to be any glitches. However, users that have been tracking 2.7 may have to reinitialize their GConf database when moving to 2.8 since there was some GConf flux in there. ===================================================== Cheers, Mezz >> ... snip ... >> >>> I think, it's good idea for you to report to the developers (in their >>> bugzilla) if you haven't done yet. >> >> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152799 > > Thanks and see bottom.. > >>> > Ok, see marcus@ replay on my previous post about in attachment. (with >>> > gnome bugzilla link, open bug) >>> > Actually now I have much faster notebook and problem with simicq >>> still >>> > exists. >>> >>> Thanks, at least this problem isn't only on FreeBSD. >> >> Yes, but it annoying ... > > I think, I will have to add all of your reports of GNOME bugzilla in the > known issue. Thanks for report! > >>> Cheers, >>> Mezz -- mezz7 at cox.net - mezz at FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome at FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?opsefvqd0o9aq2h7>