From owner-cvs-all Wed Aug 26 14:27:53 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA23452 for cvs-all-outgoing; Wed, 26 Aug 1998 14:27:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all) Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.119.24.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA23119; Wed, 26 Aug 1998 14:26:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA13306; Wed, 26 Aug 1998 23:25:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id XAA01056; Wed, 26 Aug 1998 23:25:50 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <19980826232550.08595@follo.net> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 23:25:50 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Coidan_Sm=F8rgrav?= , Matt Dillon Cc: "Dag-Erling C. Smxf8rgrav" , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/ping ping.c References: <199808262100.OAA06770@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i In-Reply-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=3Cxzp90kbfo8r=2Efsf=40olvaldi=2Eifi=2Euio=2Eno=3E=3B_fro?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?m_Dag-Erling_Coidan_Sm=F8rgrav__on_Wed=2C_Aug_26=2C_1998_?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?at_11=3A05=3A08PM_+0200?= Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, Aug 26, 1998 at 11:05:08PM +0200, Dag-Erling Coidan Smørgrav wrote: > Matt Dillon writes: > > The problems we've had with an unlimited -c has been more one of > > forgetfullness... a user will start a ping going and forget to kill > > it. It would be nice if ping did *NOT* default to an 'infinite' count, > > even if users are allowed to specify an option to set an infinite count. > > POLA. Everybody else's ping has an infinite count by default. This is not true. I've seen 'em go from 3 and upwards, and I've also seen 'em report just "elvis is alive." :-) I agree with Matt's suggestion. -c 0 for infinity, perhaps? Eivind.