From owner-freebsd-doc Fri May 3 13:39:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from smtp1.rdc-kc.rr.com (smtp1.rdc-kc.rr.com [24.94.162.200]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A96C37B417 for ; Fri, 3 May 2002 13:39:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thinkpad (ip68-97-5-153.ok.ok.cox.net [68.97.5.153]) by smtp1.rdc-kc.rr.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g43Kdkpt002361 for ; Fri, 3 May 2002 15:39:47 -0500 (CDT) From: "Erik Moe" To: Subject: FreeBSD as monitoring workstation Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 15:40:41 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This article talks about a test that compared different OS's and their ability to perform as network monitor. To quote the article, "FreeBSD had the best capture performance and Windows NT had the worst". Go figure. http://www.oreillynet.com/lpt/a//network/2002/04/26/nettap.html Sincerely, Erik Moe emoe@mmcable.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message