From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 10 16:28:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22DEC106566C for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:28:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from licquia@linuxfoundation.org) Received: from rimu.licquia.org (rimu.licquia.org [72.249.37.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF7C08FC08 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:28:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server1.internal.licquia.org (c-98-220-117-231.hsd1.in.comcast.net [98.220.117.231]) by rimu.licquia.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C24740334 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 11:28:07 -0500 (CDT) Received: from server1.internal.licquia.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by server1.internal.licquia.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFEE198066 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 12:28:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.50.14] (unknown [192.168.50.14]) by server1.internal.licquia.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A784098063 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 12:28:33 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4DC967B1.70102@linuxfoundation.org> Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 12:28:33 -0400 From: Jeff Licquia User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org References: <4DC8B14E.4050400@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (FHS) and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 16:28:36 -0000 On 05/10/2011 10:31 AM, Mark Felder wrote: > This might seem rather blunt/rude but honestly I don't foresee the > FreeBSD project integrating with the FHS. The hier(7) layout has been a > lot of work and it's something the project really strives to standardize > on. As a FreeBSD user, we've been used to "porting" applications to not > only run on FreeBSD but also adhere properly to the hier(7) structure. > But if the FHS wants to adopt hier(7) we won't complain.... Not at all; that's precisely the kind of feedback I'm looking for.