From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 15 02:03:15 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9A23416A4CE; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 02:03:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from postman.arcor.de (postman2.arcor-online.net [151.189.0.152])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E704643D46; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 02:03:14 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com)
Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-51-138.reverse.qsc.de
	[212.202.51.138])	(authenticated bits=0)i2FA3Cko005861
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
	Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:03:12 +0100 (MET)
Received: from [172.16.0.2] (helo=fillmore-labs.com)
	by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD)
	id 1B2ow9-0009DR-5G; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:03:09 +0100
Message-ID: <40557F53.1060000@fillmore-labs.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:02:59 +0100
From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>
Organization: Fillmore Labs GmbH - http://www.fillmore-labs.com/
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nakata Maho <chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp>
References: <200403130236.i2D2atOx068933@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<4052773D.5010507@fillmore-labs.com>
	<20040315.185903.596518725.chat95@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040315.185903.596518725.chat95@mac.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9
cc: maho@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/editors/openoffice-1.1 Makefile
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 10:03:15 -0000

Nakata Maho wrote:

[...]
>=20
>>Wouldn't it be better to come up with a patch and port it for review,
>>than using the FreeBSD CVS for development?
>=20
> No. currently I cannot do it. Since OOo is huge port, comparable to
> entire FreeBSD sourcecode. Maintaining this port is extremely difficult=

> if there's no such kind of thing (e.g., patch without IssueZilla ticket=
),
> we are soon confused what are committed or what aren't.
>=20
> My standpoint is reduce OOo patches to build as far as possible(remembe=
r,
> there were over 120 patches to build), however,=20
> still we have many (minor or major) problems, so we have ~10 patches.=20
> IMHO, development speed of OOo is extremely fast. to catch up with it, =
such kind
> of things are quite necessary.

How about a private CVS repository, like gnome, kde or many other project=
s
have? You leave FreeBSD useres without a working OpenOffice.org port, and=

I can't really see the benefits of your approach.

Just my 0.02 =80
    Oliver