Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:29:38 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_sig.c Message-ID: <200411011429.38840.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20041029234823.GW24892@elvis.mu.org> References: <200410290824.i9T8Oflr047896@repoman.freebsd.org> <200410291338.50383.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20041029234823.GW24892@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 29 October 2004 07:48 pm, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> [041029 12:49] wrote: > > On Friday 29 October 2004 04:24 am, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > alfred 2004-10-29 08:24:41 UTC > > > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > > > Modified files: > > > sys/kern kern_sig.c > > > Log: > > > Backout 1.291. > > > > > > re doesn't seem to think this fixes: > > > Desired features for 5.3-RELEASE "More truss problems" > > > > Umm, the todo list always lags the fixes. This is nothing personal, it's > > just that approving requests, etc. takes up most of re@'s limited time. > > Geez. Usually the reson the todo gets updated is that someone explicitly > > e-mails re@ saying "you can move this item from todo to done". As with > > other e-mails sent to re@ (like MFC requests), if they don't respond to > > it, it probably got lost in the bitbucket, so you have to resend it until > > you get an ack. (Kind of like TCP. :-P) > > I made 3-4 requestss, each one had an ACK that said, "sorry, right > on it!" > > It's just not acceptable. Are you volunteering to be an re@ secretary ala wilko@? -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200411011429.38840.jhb>