From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 5 15:39:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5798E1065674 for ; Tue, 5 May 2009 15:39:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ssanders@opnet.com) Received: from smtp-hq2.opnet.com (smtp-hq2.opnet.com [192.104.65.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EEA18FC15 for ; Tue, 5 May 2009 15:39:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ssanders@opnet.com) Received: from [172.16.12.251] (wtn12251.opnet.com [172.16.12.251]) by smtp.opnet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF79E21100A5 for ; Tue, 5 May 2009 11:20:21 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4A005935.40206@opnet.com> Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 11:20:21 -0400 From: Stephen Sanders Organization: OpNet User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080206040101010403070406" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: VM sysctl tuning X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Stephen Sanders List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 15:39:24 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080206040101010403070406 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Does any know if there is any advantage to tuning sysctl's for the VM when one has an insane amount of memory in their machine? We've a system with 16GB of RAM that we are attempting to optimize the system's memory copy and disk write performance. Thanks. --------------080206040101010403070406--