Date: Sun, 8 Mar 1998 19:25:28 -0800 (PST) From: Tom <tom@sdf.com> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu> Cc: Open Systems Networking <opsys@mail.webspan.net>, scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Softupdates with new CAM snapshot Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.980308192356.26994D-100000@misery.sdf.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980308221531.438M-100000@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 8 Mar 1998, Chuck Robey wrote: > On Sun, 8 Mar 1998, Open Systems Networking wrote: > > > Does anyone know if the new CAM snapshot will now work with softupdates > > since softupdates is now in the tree? > > Before CAM's config didnt recognize softupdates in the kernel config. > > Do they both work together now? > > I hate having to choose one over the other. > > They shouldn't. A disk driver shouldn't know anything about a file > sytem, should it? I'd be disappointed if it did, not in the loss of > capability, but because that'd be unclean. Since both CAM and Softupdates are distributed as patches, and both patches modify some of the same files, you can't install both without some fiddling. Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.980308192356.26994D-100000>