From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 24 18:07:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816C0EFB for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 18:07:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f45.google.com (mail-pb0-f45.google.com [209.85.160.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A5A4A00 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 18:07:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id ro8so3821729pbb.4 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 11:07:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=eOIQjVZN4QH61wH/fD6SEwn1vUQyr5oE6f9ZgfPGlW8=; b=e6CLaocZytA+dx8/iOzvIPvUdeOh+L5/YUZWGbSHUI2U8PpAR5YZN0iQHkKLDry9M2 Ov7pIPbU4jgeoLeg1p8EAT+XKpiZ8hDYNqVACawcNS8/7HTyDJEyuO/rvu3LHvuQjpM6 jZEH7J3jLIhhgOUKLanUUgTt7ztSeGJZgF+Rs= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=eOIQjVZN4QH61wH/fD6SEwn1vUQyr5oE6f9ZgfPGlW8=; b=HqiRXo8eLHYOawbjSY/gSpgO+EBC1tEUDuuyxFOsEE1qUvhP0HOzyWlsRnsoDdw3X1 PjblZFeqL/44QyRYVTMZ+saJO+q30qbnoaHQMxayI64kjPSfGe5AVorBQKdI/q0QXhbp IVLaDkOyckRfDqHWojFhVpJpOB375luTjgpJCpfjQlr/JawMtdjdmfCW7DHj9+m77UOp 3iEXh/n4yQui6iH9BNBFHVNYM2K1iN5MMwHDRmZC7/Aay5Q31gm69YCRYEvM+p7S2oft hkpOXqLSjngxpSNVVABbzJJAt8VFeRVXc4KpIUjGFiMnpIje4SIaypCwOFJ2rwI6OgVU TJvA== X-Received: by 10.66.162.70 with SMTP id xy6mr13949109pab.94.1364148446749; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 11:07:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lists@eitanadler.com Received: by 10.66.139.162 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 11:06:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3e6265f94c4e53e22b8cfa7d45efa635.squirrel@mouf.net> References: <201303241505.r2OF5kab012961@svn.freebsd.org> <514F17A3.7030203@FreeBSD.org> <3e6265f94c4e53e22b8cfa7d45efa635.squirrel@mouf.net> From: Eitan Adler Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 14:06:56 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -GXnCmYwvEq0godh7V7Ve6xm8Z8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r315126 - in head/net: . tigervnc tigervnc/files To: Steve Wills Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnPfPw9KenWiphxxATC8vGdYbFgH/F/y+Mk+VjEuxWtD2SL+mE5Nogvshoq/jGYGwBXoj+5 Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Bryan Drewery X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 18:07:27 -0000 On 24 March 2013 12:34, Steve Wills wrote: >> On 3/24/2013 10:05 AM, Steve Wills wrote: >>> +USE_CMAKE= yes >> >> See CHANGES 20130319. Should now use USES=cmake > > Done, but I'm not sure why. I looked at the stuff in CHANGES about USES > and couldn't see why one is better than the other. Is there some > documentation I'm missing. USES provides "on demand" loading of modules. USE_* requires special logic in b.p.m for each flag. > And wouldn't you prefer if portlint had warned me about this when I used > it, rather than having to send these out by hand? I know I would certainly > rather do it right the first time than get called out for doing it wrong. +1 -- Eitan Adler Source, Ports, Doc committer Bugmeister, Ports Security teams