Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 24 Mar 2013 14:06:56 -0400
From:      Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org>
To:        Steve Wills <swills@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r315126 - in head/net: . tigervnc tigervnc/files
Message-ID:  <CAF6rxg=d60zF-nhefr_Lk-iHdpwmPfMAPF71DM%2B3ghivvqH6hQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3e6265f94c4e53e22b8cfa7d45efa635.squirrel@mouf.net>
References:  <201303241505.r2OF5kab012961@svn.freebsd.org> <514F17A3.7030203@FreeBSD.org> <3e6265f94c4e53e22b8cfa7d45efa635.squirrel@mouf.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24 March 2013 12:34, Steve Wills <swills@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> On 3/24/2013 10:05 AM, Steve Wills wrote:
>>> +USE_CMAKE=  yes
>>
>> See CHANGES 20130319. Should now use USES=cmake
>
> Done, but I'm not sure why. I looked at the stuff in CHANGES about USES
> and couldn't see why one is better than the other. Is there some
> documentation I'm missing.

USES provides "on demand" loading of modules.  USE_* requires special
logic in b.p.m for each flag.

> And wouldn't you prefer if portlint had warned me about this when I used
> it, rather than having to send these out by hand? I know I would certainly
> rather do it right the first time than get called out for doing it wrong.

+1


-- 
Eitan Adler
Source, Ports, Doc committer
Bugmeister, Ports Security teams



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxg=d60zF-nhefr_Lk-iHdpwmPfMAPF71DM%2B3ghivvqH6hQ>