Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 1 Feb 2014 11:35:23 +0100
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Alix?= <frederic.alix@fredalix.com>
To:        "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Bhyve and network virtualization
Message-ID:  <CAN4tE3-20Ub8uXy2DchfnfX5DJqWzkWD8pPxQmCQAhap0CEg2A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <038D2C87-0034-49DC-8DA5-A930798264D6@schema31.it>
References:  <CAN4tE39V%2B5wfEeeQd8RDrEHwpDovUXYPe35OEmSTLStpEnLKdA@mail.gmail.com> <038D2C87-0034-49DC-8DA5-A930798264D6@schema31.it>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Few minutes ago i read this:

http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2013-10-2013-12.html#FreeBSD-Host=
-Support-for-OpenStack-and-OpenContrail

Hum... OpenContrail port .. :p
I am not interesting by OpenStack but OpenContrail, of course !!!!!

After a little search, i found this:
http://opencontrail.org/opencontrail-weekly-meeting/
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/opencontrail/+spec/freebsd-vrouter

It's exactly what i would like !

Now, i'll survey the OpenContail ports

For the curious who they want understand what is OpenContrail, go to this
link:
http://opencontrail.org/opencontrail-architecture-documentation/#section1_2


fax


2014-02-01 Andrea Brancatelli <abrancatelli@schema31.it>:

> Hello Frederic,
>
> This is an interesting question. Funny thing is in the past day I had the
> same doubt, but after some minutes I realized FreeBSD already has
> everything that is needed to handle a "virtualization network" by itself.
> Obviously what's missing is some kind of GUI or guided path to do it
> easily. At least that's what I thought.
>
> Today I have seen openvswitch site and understood that it has many more
> features, but frankly non of them actually raised any interest in me. May=
be
> I didn't understand them, but in general id like to jeep things simple, a=
s
> simple as possible. And simply put openvswitch seemed to me the next
> project aimed to fixing a badly designed tcp stack not working good for
> many VMs and such. And after all that's the reason why I'm using FreeBSD
> and not Linux, and that's also the reason one of the most powerful
> networking appliance as pfsense is based on FreeBSD and not Linux.
>
> So, simply put, instead of spend time adopting something like openvswitch
> I'd rather spend time writing something for FreeBSD directly (and maybe
> merge it with bhyve project)... But, hey, that's me...
>
> Andrea "Mr.SK" Brancatelli
>
> > On 01/feb/2014, at 10:03, Fr=E9d=E9ric Alix <frederic.alix@fredalix.com=
>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi !
> >
> > I am learning how use bhyve and actullay, it's a real pleasure to use i=
t
> :-)
> > I would like build a virtual infra in a box. Many bhyve vm for each
> > services. Firewalls, routers, dns, app serv, databases serv, ...
> > For this, bhyve is just perfect.
> > Now, i need a tool for build a virtual network, like crossbow in Illumo=
s.
> > What are you prefer for this job ? OpenvSwitch ? VDE ? other ?
> >
> > Thank you, and long live to bhyve !
> >
> > fax
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-virtualization-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN4tE3-20Ub8uXy2DchfnfX5DJqWzkWD8pPxQmCQAhap0CEg2A>