From owner-freebsd-java Mon Aug 19 21:16:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A429A37B400; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 21:16:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mgr3.xmission.com (mgr3.xmission.com [198.60.22.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA02443E42; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 21:16:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: from mail by mgr3.xmission.com with spam-scanned (Exim 3.35 #1) id 17h0R0-0005J7-00; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 22:16:06 -0600 Received: from [207.135.128.145] (helo=misty.eyesbeyond.com) by mgr3.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 17h0Qz-0005Is-00; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 22:16:02 -0600 Received: (from glewis@localhost) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g7K4Fsv00752; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 13:45:54 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) X-Authentication-Warning: misty.eyesbeyond.com: glewis set sender to glewis@eyesbeyond.com using -f Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 13:45:54 +0930 From: Greg Lewis To: Ernst de Haan Cc: Nate Williams , absinthe@pobox.com, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Please review: new Java Project docs Message-ID: <20020820134553.A733@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <200208170958.14422.absinthe@pobox.com> <200208191300.54857.znerd@FreeBSD.org> <15713.3405.773127.501053@emerger.yogotech.com> <200208191731.08310.znerd@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200208191731.08310.znerd@FreeBSD.org>; from znerd@FreeBSD.ORG on Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 05:31:08PM +0200 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.1 required=8.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,X_AUTH_WARNING version=2.31 X-Spam-Level: Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 05:31:08PM +0200, Ernst de Haan wrote: > On Monday 19 August 2002 17:22, Nate Williams wrote: > > > 5) 2.1.3.3 Will the JDK 1.1 port really be removed? I don't think so, > > > since it is really used quite a lot still... Nate? > > > > I had no plans on removing it, since it's smaller and lighter than the > > 1.2+ stuff. > > And it's still used in the field. So I agree with Nate; it really should not > be removed from the ports collection. Its also a dependency for 1.2.2, so you'd invalidate two JDKs at once ;). -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message